Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:03

Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do you cope when your mother doesn't love you?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Liquid Glass tvOS redesign is restricted to second-generation Apple TV 4K and later - AppleInsider
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Donald Trump's family launches 'Made in America' T1 smartphone. Here's what it offers - Mint
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Starbucks moves to the next phase in its turnaround: Winning over employees - CNBC
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
RKF Jr. May Have Just Ruined Our Best Weapon Against Bird Flu - The Bulwark
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Which animal has the best sense of smell? - Live Science
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?